Patriot security systems.com. Have you ever wondered if it was legal to video or audio record someone else or what about someone else recording you stick around in this video about legal consequences of publishing a video we discuss that very topic? Hello everyone, mark mac Laurie president to a patriot like Tronic security systems.
Today I want to discuss video and audio recording with other people or other people recording you. First, I must get this disclaimer out of the way and please listen very carefully to it because it is essential.
I am not an attorney I am not authorized or qualified to give anyone legal advice on this or any other topic. Furthermore, the issues discussed in this video assume we are talking about laws that fall under the United States of America jurisdiction.
Please consult your normal for legal advice on the issues discussed in this article about legal consequences of publishing a video. At this point of law, you might be asking well. If I can’t give you legal advice, why are we doing this video, the answer is simple.
Our related Articles :
Do you need permission to post a video of someone ?
We have clients who want to know why they or someone else can or cannot record video or audio in any given situation. And you do not have to be an attorney to discuss legal matters had cable news.
Does it all the time there is a difference between discussing a legal issue and giving legal advice .so now with that out of the way on to the topic at hand. The law looks at the recording of audio and video very differently. I feel the laws governing audio recordings are much more strict than that of a video.
You can generally take anyone’s picture without their permission as long as one necessary condition is met. That is it cannot be in the area where that person can reasonably expect privacy in legal consequences of publishing a video. Now I’ve got to tell you this is where the lawmakers are a federal state. Local governments drive me nuts.
Because in my opinion that wording and everywhere one can reasonably expect privacy is open to interpretation .why can’t the law the word precisely.
Quite honestly and about, I would expect privacy not to be an area where you reasonably wish privacy or vice versa.
So with that said all I can tell you is my opinion on the matter. And that is there are only a select few places we can reasonably expect privacy, and they are. In a bathroom. In a bedroom. It could fall under the bedroom category in a changing or fitting room and a hotel or motel room.
Can we Sue Someone for Recording Me Without our Permission ?
I know very well of you out there just jumped out of your seats and shouted Hey what about my own home indeed on the title to reasonably expect privacy throughout my entire family not only the bedrooms and .
the bathrooms what we’re going to get to that in just a minute or 2, but one thing’s for sure you are not entitled to reasonably expect privacy anywhere out in public not on the public streets of legal consequences of publishing a video.
you walk or drive on or .any of the stores you visit we’ve all seen those videos were a couple of people get into a disagreement.
One of them push out their android phone and starts taking pictures or video of the other person. And the other person insists that they stopped because they didn’t permit them to take their picture.
What are the legal consequences of publishing a video of a person without their consent ?
The chances are that if it is still photographing the person is taking, or video without audio and I’ll get into that point in a minute.
The person protests two years now lock in public anyone can take your picture any time without your permission. If this weren’t the case, the paparazzi would be out of business.
When out in public your image is probably taking 100 times a day without your permission every time you step into a bank a convenience store gas station our restaurant you name it they’re taking your picture. None of them has permission to do so. Nor do they need it.
Now getting back to privacy in your own home well she was a classic problem of interpretation. Let’s say a man suspected his wife was cheating on him, .so he sets up a camera to record activities in his living room while he’s at work. Amber not the bathroom or the bedroom he’s living on.
Furthermore, to keep it simple, the camera he uses does not have audio recording capabilities just video. Now let’s say the camera throughout the day captures some video footage of the white in legal consequences of publishing a video.
I’m not going to say what kind of footage or footage was incriminating .because; it’s not essential; it just captures video footage of the wife without her consent now in your opinion. I was a little broken because the wife had a reasonable expectation of privacy under those circumstances.
I’m not sure that there is a right answer. If U. S. 2 attorneys there’s a good chance you’ll get two different answers. You’ll probably get the same results if you ask for two additional charges or even two separate juries.
Again we run into this problem because the law is not like mathematics.
There’s almost always an absolute answer to me with some rare exceptions. There’s virtually never a piece of complete answer news. You were there seen to be a component of interpretation with matters of the war.
If you have any questions on which states are one-party consent and which states are all-party consent just Google it, you’ll find hundreds of sites with this information. This concludes our discussion on the legality of recording video in legal consequences of publishing a video and audio as it pertains to the security alarm and closed-circuit TV industry if you have any questions or comments.